After two decades of leading projects across industries, I’ve learned that a fast, credible charter beats a perfect one that arrives late. Here’s the 45-minute flow I use when I need alignment now and governance can’t wait.
0–10 min: Frame the mandate
- Why now: the business driver in one sentence (cost, risk, compliance, growth)
- Desired outcome: how we’ll know it worked (leading + lagging indicators)
- Guardrails: budget band, key dates, and non-negotiables
10–20 min: Sketch scope and constraints
- In: the 3–5 things we will deliver; Out: the 3–5 things we won’t
- Dependencies: upstream decisions, vendor lead times, data availability
- Constraints: technology, regulatory, staffing, fiscal calendar
20–30 min: Map stakeholders
- Accountable sponsor and decision rights (tie to RACI/DACI)
- Core team by role (PM, BA, tech lead, QA, change, vendor)
- Influencers and veto points; how they’ll be engaged
30–40 min: Risks and assumptions
- Top 5 risks with simple probability/impact, owner, and first action
- Assumptions that must hold (environment stability, funding, SMEs available)
- Early mitigations that keep options open (parallel tracks, spikes, proofs)
40–45 min: Baseline and circulate
- Capture the above in a one-pager template; set version
v0.1 - Agree the first review gate (sponsor sign-off within 48 hours)
- File it in your controlled repository and publish to stakeholders
Templates that help
- Charter one-pager (objective, scope, success, guardrails, risks, RACI)
- Stakeholder map + cadence (weekly core, biweekly steering, monthly exec)
- Risk/assumption log tied to RAID and change control
The goal isn’t bureaucracy—it’s shared intent. A crisp charter gives you the authority to plan, and the constraints you need to say “no” when scope creep shows up. Keep it short, circulate quickly, and baseline early.